
We interview your technical team directly, extract the real uncertainties and experimentation ourselves, and build an R&D claim that is properly prepared for lodgement and scrutiny later.
Start Your R&D Claim Review

We interview your technical team directly, extract the real uncertainties and experimentation ourselves, and build an R&D claim that is properly prepared for lodgement and scrutiny later.
Start Your R&D Claim Review
Eligibility – Is your work actually R&D in AusIndustry terms?
Technical story – Has it been pressure-tested, or does it just “sound right”?
Time – Writing activities properly takes time most teams don’t have.
Copy-paste risk – Generic write-ups and thin evidence get pulled apart in review.
Real risk – Lodging is the easy part. Holding up in an AusIndustry or ATO review is what matters.
Eligibility – Is your work actually R&D in AusIndustry terms?
Technical story – Has it been pressure-tested, or does it just “sound right”?
Time – Writing activities properly takes time most teams don’t have.
Copy-paste risk – Generic write-ups and thin evidence get pulled apart in review.
Real risk – Lodging is the easy part. Holding up in an AusIndustry or ATO review is what matters.
Work where the outcome wasn’t known upfront and required real experiments or trial-and-error to resolve a technical problem. It’s not about “innovation”. It’s about uncertainty.
Yes. On the call we can give you a ballpark refund based on your spend, structure and how your work fits the rules.
Most clients go from first call to money in the bank in around eight weeks.
No. Just explain what you’re building and the problems you hit. If you’ve written something already, email it thru — if not, we’ll ask the right questions.
The ATO expects you to justify why someone spent 30%, 50% or 75% of their time on R&D. Timesheets are ideal. If you don’t have them, we run a time-audit so your percentages are defensible.
No. You shouldn’t be writing your own R&D claim. We interview your technical people, gather evidence and prepare the full application.
About five hours across the entire process — a technical interview, a quick review of our summary, basic finance data and a time-audit.
Sometimes, but software is messy. Routine development isn’t R&D. We’ll help separate normal dev work from genuine technical uncertainty and experiments.
Yes. We’ll flag any weak explanations, missing evidence, inflated costs or things likely to attract review attention.
If they never spoke to your technical team or made you write everything yourself, that’s a red flag. We’ll go through your claim and highlight risks before someone else does.
You can, but it’s risky. AI tends to invent experiments, use generic language and miss the technical logic AusIndustry expects. They pick up AI-written content easily.
Vague technical descriptions, no experiments, inflated labour percentages, AI-generated content, and claims written by people who weren’t actually involved in the work.
Yes. We manage the entire response — drafting, evidence, mapping experiments and dealing with the logic AusIndustry and the ATO expect.
Most people switch when they’re tired of writing their own claims or don’t trust their current process. We interview your technical team and build the claim properly.
Yes. We can tell you exactly where you’re exposed and what needs to be tightened before submitting.
No. If you’re eligible, we’ll tell you. If not, we’ll tell you that too. Often we save people the call entirely and advise self-lodgement or not lodging at all.
Simple and transparent. No surprises, no hidden extras, no “admin charges”. Just the fee we agree on… and that’s it.
Yes. Especially with timesheets, evidence, test results and all the things everyone promises to “start doing properly next year”.
We don’t hand you a blank template and say “fill this in”. We interview your technical people and do the heavy lifting — you focus on building things, not writing essays.
Absolutely. If it’s clearly ineligible, we’ll tell you straight so you don’t waste time (or feel the need to leave us a dramatic 1-star Google review).
Yes - we handle the drafting, evidence and responses. Just note that audit/review support is a separate service because it can involve a lot of detailed work. We’ll always tell you the scope and cost upfront so there are no surprises.
Work where the outcome wasn’t known upfront and required real experiments or trial-and-error to resolve a technical problem. It’s not about “innovation”. It’s about uncertainty.
Yes. On the call we can give you a ballpark refund based on your spend, structure and how your work fits the rules.
Most clients go from first call to money in the bank in around eight weeks.
No. Just explain what you’re building and the problems you hit. If you’ve written something already, email it thru — if not, we’ll ask the right questions.
The ATO expects you to justify why someone spent 30%, 50% or 75% of their time on R&D. Timesheets are ideal. If you don’t have them, we run a time-audit so your percentages are defensible.
No. You shouldn’t be writing your own R&D claim. We interview your technical people, gather evidence and prepare the full application.
About five hours across the entire process — a technical interview, a quick review of our summary, basic finance data and a time-audit.
Sometimes, but software is messy. Routine development isn’t R&D. We’ll help separate normal dev work from genuine technical uncertainty and experiments.
Yes. We’ll flag any weak explanations, missing evidence, inflated costs or things likely to attract review attention.
If they never spoke to your technical team or made you write everything yourself, that’s a red flag. We’ll go through your claim and highlight risks before someone else does.
You can, but it’s risky. AI tends to invent experiments, use generic language and miss the technical logic AusIndustry expects. They pick up AI-written content easily.
Vague technical descriptions, no experiments, inflated labour percentages, AI-generated content, and claims written by people who weren’t actually involved in the work.
Yes. We manage the entire response — drafting, evidence, mapping experiments and dealing with the logic AusIndustry and the ATO expect.
Most people switch when they’re tired of writing their own claims or don’t trust their current process. We interview your technical team and build the claim properly.
Yes. We can tell you exactly where you’re exposed and what needs to be tightened before submitting.
No. If you’re eligible, we’ll tell you. If not, we’ll tell you that too. Often we save people the call entirely and advise self-lodgement or not lodging at all.
Simple and transparent. No surprises, no hidden extras, no “admin charges”. Just the fee we agree on… and that’s it.
Yes. Especially with timesheets, evidence, test results and all the things everyone promises to “start doing properly next year”.
We don’t hand you a blank template and say “fill this in”. We interview your technical people and do the heavy lifting — you focus on building things, not writing essays.
Absolutely. If it’s clearly ineligible, we’ll tell you straight so you don’t waste time (or feel the need to leave us a dramatic 1-star Google review).
Yes - we handle the drafting, evidence and responses. Just note that audit/review support is a separate service because it can involve a lot of detailed work. We’ll always tell you the scope and cost upfront so there are no surprises.
Book a 15-minute pressure-test.
You’ll get a straight answer on where you stand.
Solid, exposed, or fixable. And what to change before you lodge.
No jargon. No pressure.
Trusted by 500+ Australian companies. 4.8★ from 300+ Google reviews.